TrueFillsbeta

Comparison

A copy-trading platform built on verifiable records

Existing platforms proved people want to follow real trading strategies. TrueFillskeeps that idea and rebuilds the two parts that aged badly across most providers: how records are trusted, and how creators are treated.

 TrueFillsTypical providers
Record verificationVerified strategies are read from the broker, so the creator never writes the record; unverified ones say so on every screenPlatform-computed track records; trust rests on the platform itself
Auto-executionTrades placed in your own account automatically, with a capital allocation and per-order cap you set, a 15 minute order expiry and a 1.5% price guardAuto-trading offered, with terms and slippage handling that vary by platform
Creator costFree verified record page; flat platform fee only when you monetizeMonthly listing fees plus a large cut of subscription revenue, commonly 40 to 50%
Strategy APIOne modern API, designed API-first, documented from day oneAPIs that are dated, partly undocumented, or an afterthought
Fill honestyRecords come from brokerage accounts, and whether an account is funded or simulated comes from the broker's own flag rather than the creator's wordModel-account fills simulated against the signal stream, rarely disclosed
Risk displayDrawdown shown before returns on every strategy page, alwaysReturns-led displays; risk stats below the fold
UISingle-purpose pages, fast, built this decadeOften dated and cluttered, a frequent user complaint

Where established providers are ahead today

An honest comparison includes that list. If you need subscriber auto-trading this month, an established provider works today. If you care most about records that can be checked by anyone, start here: read the methodology or verify the chain yourself.

Comparison reflects common industry practices as of September 2026; verify any specific provider’s current terms independently. Trading involves risk of loss.